Divorce law - a disaster?

We have offered to engage, you have declined. We have locked your second thread, as it is superfluous to have 2 threads running on the same topic.

A professional stance on prenups can be found here:

www.wikivorce.com/divorce/Wikizine-Family-Law/

and indeed in several posts on this forum.

There is a lot to be gained by using the senses in proportion

Elle x

DivorceLawyer wrote:

We have offered to engage, you have declined. We have locked your second thread, as it is superfluous to have 2 threads running on the same topic.

A professional stance on prenups can be found here:

www.wikivorce.com/divorce/Wikizine-Family-Law/

and indeed in several posts on this forum.

But there was not 2 topics on that conversation. I had merely intersected someone elses thread regarding Divorce.

When I entered the thread with my opinion about the Pre-nup idea, we then went off on a tangent. Coupled with your abusive retorts and the importance of such a topic, I thought it wise to start a new thread about it.

Being a newbie, I had no idea there had been other threads denoted to the same issue and if there were, why did you not direct me to them instead of having a go and stopping that particular thread.

Did you lock the other threads which were about pre-nups too?

Gargoyle - this isn't the place to argue your point. This is a public forum (within the wikivorce community) to comment on topics therein.

As a newbie, I suggest you engage in the debate you intimate that you want, or allow others to engage with this thread.

Shezi

Gargoyle,

If you consider my posts to be abusive, or the locking of a thread unfair, please do make a complaint to Wikivorce Team via PM.

Regarding other threads on prenups, you can either use the search facility or go onto my profile and go through my previous posts.

This is no longer a debate, and you may wish, again to reflect on your actions here. While you are attempting to engage me to answer your questions, you are stopping me from undertaking other tasks in the forum, which your fellow members may well consider to be a less that productive use of the limited time I spend in the forum these days.

DivorceLawyer wrote:

Gargoyle,

If you consider my posts to be abusive, or the locking of a thread unfair, please do make a complaint to Wikivorce Team via PM.

Regarding other threads on prenups, you can either use the search facility or go onto my profile and go through my previous posts.

This is no longer a debate, and you may wish, again to reflect on your actions here. While you are attempting to engage me to answer your questions, you are stopping me from undertaking other tasks in the forum, which your fellow members may well consider to be a less that productive use of the limited time I spend in the forum these days.

Sorry to take up so much of your time.

It's been great philosophising ( is that how you say it?) with a barrister on family law and Pre-nups for free.

It reminds me of a clip from War of The Roses when Danny Devito talks to Micheal Douglas about earning $400 an hour and yet he will give his advice for free. I'm honoured.

Can I ask though, if my posts are less than productive, why do you go at great lengths to reply?

after paying a 50% deposit of the purcase price of our first house, borrowing 86,000 to buy a business off of my mother, my husband wants half the house all of the business and profits from the business, and only wants me to pay me periodic payments from the business,recently he has offered that we pay my mum back from the sale of the house, half each and that has taken 2 years to offer that, denies access to the business violently, has attacked our children, so i have to have a police escourt ever time i go to my own business, got very little money, after paying my junior solicitor, but he can afford nice expensive solicitors, so dont tell me the law is on the womans side because it is not working for me