The UK's largest and most visited divorce site.
Modern, convenient and affordable services.

We've helped over 1 million people since 2007.

 
Click this button for details of our
email, phone nbr and free consultations.
 

Child maintenance query

  • Purplerainbow
  • Purplerainbow's Avatar Posted by
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
03 Apr 25 #525573 by Purplerainbow
Topic started by Purplerainbow
Hi
My ex-husband and I have a child arrangement order (CAO) that stipulates our children (ages 14 & 10) spend every weds overnight with him, then takes them to school on thurs, and to spend every other weekend with him from Friday after work until he takes them to school on Monday. However our sons frequently choose not to visit their father. I consistently encourage them to maintain a relationship with him and explain the importance of doing so, but they often refuse to go. He currently pays child maintenance (not via CMS) based on the overnight stays outlined in the CAO. Given that the children rarely adhere to the schedule, I am considering reviewing the CM payments to reflect the actual number of nights they spend with their father and how the situation appears to be evolving. My question is: Should CM be calculated based on the CAO’s stipulated schedule, or should it be based on the actual number of overnight stays/visits? The CAO has been in effect since April 2023, but the arrangement only began in October 2023 when he moved out of the family home. Initially the children did visit (although there were challenges) but their visits have become increasingly infrequent over time. Unfortunately I anticipate difficulties discussing this matter with my ex-husband. He is not amicable and “co-parenting” with him is often challenging.

  • WYSPECIAL
  • WYSPECIAL's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
05 Apr 25 - 05 Apr 25 #525581 by WYSPECIAL
Reply from WYSPECIAL
If it’s a private agreement then it’s completely up to you what you both agree.

How much difference will it make to payments?

If it was via CMS then they look at the evidence presented to them from both parties then make a decision based on that.

Check out how much it would be via CMS before rocking the boat as he may choose to go via the CMS route if payments are lower and if he currently pays any extras such as half of school uniform or activities you may find that all stops.
Last edit: 05 Apr 25 by WYSPECIAL.

  • Purplerainbow
  • Purplerainbow's Avatar Posted by
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
07 Apr 25 #525587 by Purplerainbow
Reply from Purplerainbow
Hi, thank you for your response.

The agreement was via solicitors.

If I were to go via the CMS calculations based on the number of nights they have stayed with him vs the CAO stipulated days, it's an extra £164 a month.

  • WYSPECIAL
  • WYSPECIAL's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
07 Apr 25 #525588 by WYSPECIAL
Reply from WYSPECIAL
Nothing to lose financially by suggesting to him that you want an increase based on the actual number of nights then.

When you say the agreement was via the solicitors has it been made into a court order? If so then it will need to be in place for a year before CMS can override it.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11

Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.

 

We can help you to get a fair financial settlement.

Negotiate a fair deal from £299

Helping you negotiate a fair financial settlement with your spouse (or their solicitor) without going to court.


Financial Mediation from £399

Financial mediation is a convenient and inexpensive way to agree on a fair financial settlement.


Consent Orders from £950

This legally binding agreement defines how assets (e.g. properties and pensions) are to be divided.


Court Support from £299

Support for people who have to go to court to get a fair divorce financial settlement without a solicitor.