Most H try and "capitalise" SM and give you extra capital instead of paying SM
With a spouse working and maximising income it is often the aim of spouses not to pay SM for more than 3/5 years if possible.
In many cases there may not be enough Capital to achieve this or say other spouse needs cap for hsng needs.
As Mike rightly says the Crt should not
Clean Break on SM UNLESS the Spouse can adjust without undue hardship.
The older the spouse the strategy can vary...say W is 55 in a long Mrge of 20 yrs+...often SM till retirement
pension share and divide capital
If younger say 45 different considerations may apply....spouse may have to bit bullet and pay SM and hope you find a new partner.
Often a factor to consider for a W is when will she likely cease to receive Tax Credits...as that is a difficult time if her income is not self sufficient as if so she will need SM.
By that time in your life as Mike says there are other issues..
when C leave home is the
FMH too large...may need to be sold to reduce "need"
At that time in life there may be inheritance factors.
Always remember to look at the s 25 MCA factors.
The Court if asked to deliberate will tend to play safe and keep SM going as the state doesn't want to support parties they would rather delegate that the x H's !!!
As Mike says your ex needs to give you consideration for the dismissal of SM ie more capital or assets....if He had a pension for 20 yrs and mrge for 10 and he offers a 50% pension share that is as good as extra capital.
Need tends to determine most normal and not high net worth cases.
Whilst you have used the callr without detailed Capital, Income, Pen details, ages, length of mrge, amt of exstng mtge it is diff to predict for you the actual outcome.