The UK's largest and most visited divorce site.
Modern, convenient and affordable services.

We've helped over 1 million people since 2007.

 
Click this button for details of our
email, phone nbr and free consultations.
 

60 vs 18

  • georgerussell
  • georgerussell's Avatar Posted by
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
21 Jan 21 #515421 by georgerussell
Topic started by georgerussell
I have an agreement to pay spousal maintenance until I’m 60. My two children are both now over 18. I’ve a few friends who have agreements to pay until their children are 18. The question is therefore can I go back to court to argue that I should no longer pay spousal maintenance? Any advice much appreciated. BackgroundWe were divorced 9 years ago after 14 years of marriage. We have 2 children who are 20 and 18. I pay spousal maintenance and child maintenance. My ex didn’t work post having children and has worked sporadically since the divorce. I am 50.

  • WYSPECIAL
  • WYSPECIAL's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
21 Jan 21 #515422 by WYSPECIAL
Reply from WYSPECIAL
You won't be able to argue that you shouldn't pay it based on the fact that your friends agreements were different.

If circumstances have changed you may be able to get a review or you may be able to capitalise your future payments and agree a lump sum instead.

Has anything changed that could justify a review?

  • .Charles
  • .Charles's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
21 Jan 21 #515433 by .Charles
Reply from .Charles
Is it an agreement or an order?

Charles

  • blkasset
  • blkasset's Avatar
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
21 Jan 21 #515435 by blkasset
Reply from blkasset
Thanks for your reply. It's set out in an order. I guess I was asking if it is more normal for terms to be until the children reach 18 or whether a potential retirement age is more common. In terms of a potential change, I'd like to stop doing my current job at some point long before 60 (which has always been the plan). I have another family now too but I understand that the priorities of the first family come first.

  • blkasset
  • blkasset's Avatar
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
21 Jan 21 #515436 by blkasset
Reply from blkasset
Thanks for your reply. It's set out in an order. I guess I was asking if it is more normal for terms to be until the children reach 18 or whether a potential retirement age is more common? In terms of a potential change, I'd like to stop doing my current job at some point long before 60 (which has always been the plan). I have another family now too but I understand that the priorities of the first family come first.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11

Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.

 

We can help you to get a fair financial settlement.

Negotiate a fair deal from £299

Helping you negotiate a fair financial settlement with your spouse (or their solicitor) without going to court.


Financial Mediation from £399

Financial mediation is a convenient and inexpensive way to agree on a fair financial settlement.


Consent Orders from £950

This legally binding agreement defines how assets (e.g. properties and pensions) are to be divided.


Court Support from £299

Support for people who have to go to court to get a fair divorce financial settlement without a solicitor.