The UK's largest and most visited divorce site.
Modern, convenient and affordable services.

We've helped over 1 million people since 2007.

 
Click this button for details of our
email, phone nbr and free consultations.
 

Just curious

  • startagain
  • startagain's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
29 May 11 #270471 by startagain
Reply from startagain
I think is should be the case of a 50:50 shared care as a starting point and a parent needs to explain why they cannot do this. I think the reason for this not happening is cost to a government they would have to fund two homes through the benefit system for in affect one family. So my belief is they are happy for the main carer to be the woman and this is probably the cheapest way to bring up the children for the state.

I take on board what sexysadie said "they think both parents should contribute to the children's costs" I have shared care but pay CM as I am classed as a NRP. But if this was the case how come in the CSA calculations if a NRP lives with someone who has kids that are not their own they pay less in CM to their own kids? So if a husband has an affair with a woman with 6 kids goes to live with her he will pay less in CM to his one kids so yes something is not right. Talk about adding insult to injury

Sometimes true 50:50 is impossible as in my case my ex has done her best to cut me out and is very hard to be the father I was because my ex's bloke moved in the same week as I had to leave and took over my role straight away. As before I was the one who run they to groups school drop and pick up 3 times a week and bizarrely enough he does this now.

My ex and her bloke bring in more than double what I do and the housing cost are half what I pay and I have the kids 6 nights out of 14 half school hols and pay CM, I buy clothes for both at mine and hers, buy school clothes, contribute to activities, top up mobiles, pocket money and have ended up buying the expensive birthday and xmas presents.

I do think it is unfair there are lots of PWC that get little or nothing from NRP and for others it is a different story. And I think it is the women who are left by their husband do worst and the ones that have an affair and move in a new bloke do better and the system appears happy to support this.

  • WYSPECIAL
  • WYSPECIAL's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
29 May 11 #270486 by WYSPECIAL
Reply from WYSPECIAL
The ones who do best are the ones that have children by lots of fathers.

3 kids with different fathers and you could be getting a 15% tax free slice of three salaries. Work 16 hours a week and get a wheel barrow full of tax credits as well. Not bad work if you can get it and gives you plenty of time to try and meet the next father.

  • survive
  • survive's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
29 May 11 #270489 by survive
Reply from survive
Just wanted to ditto start again reply and say I totally agree!!!!

survive
x

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11

Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.

 

We can help you to get a fair financial settlement.

Negotiate a fair deal from £299

Helping you negotiate a fair financial settlement with your spouse (or their solicitor) without going to court.


Financial Mediation from £399

Financial mediation is a convenient and inexpensive way to agree on a fair financial settlement.


Consent Orders from £950

This legally binding agreement defines how assets (e.g. properties and pensions) are to be divided.


Court Support from £299

Support for people who have to go to court to get a fair divorce financial settlement without a solicitor.