The UK's largest and most visited divorce site.
Modern, convenient and affordable services.

We've helped over 1 million people since 2007.

 
Click this button for details of our
email, phone nbr and free consultations.
 

Child Support Overhaul Proposed

  • rubytuesday
  • rubytuesday's Avatar Posted by
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
13 Jan 11 #244912 by rubytuesday
Topic started by rubytuesday
From the BBC news site:-

Ministers are proposing an overhaul of the current system of child support, saying it too often "drives a wedge" between parents and their offspring.

They say more separating couples should be helped to find a settlement on their own in the interests of the child.

People will be encouraged to explore all options before going to court but must pay a fee for statutory help.

One charity has expressed concern about the assistance available to the most vulnerable and poorest families.

The child maintenance system has long been criticised for being inefficient and failing to support parents most in need.

The much-maligned Child Support Agency was effectively axed in 2008 when it was rolled into a new body - the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission.

Ministers say there is currently a £4bn arrears in maintenance payments from non-resident parents while less than half of the 3.5 million children whose parents are separated are adequately supported.

New approach
As part of a proposed shake-up - which is subject to consultation - some couples will be offered help to calculate how much maintenance is appropriate for their children.


"If the welfare of the child is to remain paramount then the system must make allowances for vulnerable families whose hands are tied by the strain of living in poverty” said Martin Narey, Barnardos chief executive

Parents will get free advice from voluntary and charitable bodies on the options available to them before deciding whether to reach an independent settlement or opt to use the statutory service.

Ministers also want to extend the role of Child Maintenance Options, the public body which provides advice to separating couples and those wanting to alter their maintenance arrangements.

They believe the new approach will encourage greater parental responsibility, allied to separate efforts to provide more counselling on relationship and financial matters.

Should individuals be unable to resolve the situation themselves and opt for statutory guidance, they will have to pay a one-off application fee - £100 for those in work, £50 for those on benefits and £20 for those in the most acute financial need.

'Better outcomes'
Officials say the charges - which will not apply to cases involving domestic violence - will recoup only a part of the current cost of processing applications.

The government stress that the proposals put child welfare first and are not being driven by the need to make savings across the public sector.

"The plans, which focus on strengthening families, will encourage responsibility," the Department for Work and Pensions said.

"The current statutory system costs about £460m a year to run and can drive a wedge between parents and their children - encouraging conflict.

"The government believes that reaching a settlement independently is far more likely to produce better outcomes for the child."

The proposals are designed to build on changes introduced by the Labour government designed to ensure parents living apart fulfil their responsibilities to support their children financially.

Welfare paramount
While it was right for parents to exercise responsibility for their childrens' welfare by resolving arrangements themselves, Barnardos said this would not be possible in all cases.

"The government need to tell us what will happen to those parents who are unable to reach an amicable settlement and equally unable to pay for a statutory service," its chief executive Martin Narey said.

"If the welfare of the child is to remain paramount then the system must make allowances for vulnerable families whose hands are tied by the strain of living in poverty."

The government is reviewing the future of the Child Support Agency, which still handles maintenance cases on a day-to-day basis. It wants more focus on vulnerable children and tackling evasion.

The Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission, which took over responsibility for assessment, guidance and enforcement, says it is making progress in pursuing parents in arrears and more than 850,000 children are now receiving support - 260,000 more than in 2006.

  • mumtoboys
  • mumtoboys's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
13 Jan 11 #244917 by mumtoboys
Reply from mumtoboys
Was just about to post this, Ruby!

Not really a surprise given the axing of the benefit disregard in April last year. I guess they have to recoup their costs somehow and are no longer doing it via the single mum on benefits route. And typical 'we're all for families' from the Conservatives, no idea whatsoever what it's like to have to deal with a marriage breakdown and the difficulties of working out what's fair for the children no matter which side of the fence you're sitting on.

I have mixed feelings. It would be good to think that some parents are swayed away from using the CSA and are able to work things out for themselves. However, I fail to see how it's going to help support those of us with exs who refuse to discuss financial matters. Indeed, the threat that I might lose some of the money my ex doesn't actually pay (!!!), I suspect will simply spur him on to keeping those two fingers stuck up in the air at me!
If it frees up the CSA to deal with the serial non-payers, all well and good. But are we going to be expected to contribute to the legal costs of pursuing an errant ex?

For anyone on benefits or a low income, it is entirely unacceptable that they should lose any money collected that should be supporting their children. All the usual child poverty arguments should kick in here - it will be interesting to see what CPAG come back with.

As for it needing to be consulted on, is there any chance wikivorce is going to be a part of that? with a huge membership of 'joe bloggs' people who are divorced/getting divorced, we should surely be a key group of people to target?

Can we keep an eye on it? I am all for writing to my MP (I have moved recently and haven't bothered him yet so that will be interesting!) but at the moment I'm not sure there's much to comment on. As it moves along and plans become clear, a co-ordinated response might be useful?

  • James53
  • James53's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
13 Jan 11 #244922 by James53
Reply from James53
Great now you will have to pay to get nothing.
What about payment by results.

  • Carrie Paechter
  • Carrie Paechter's Avatar
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
More
13 Jan 11 #244928 by Carrie Paechter
Reply from Carrie Paechter
I am completely puzzled by the logic behind this. I listened to the item on the Today programme this morning and am no nearer understanding it.

As far as I can see no-one uses the CSA unless they have to, as they are inefficient and don't deal well with anyone who isn't on PAYE. As the CSA website has a free calculator, it is easy to do without them if you are able to agree between yourselves, so presumably anyone who can, does so.

It appears to me that all this will do is charge the people who are already in the position of needing to go through the CSA. It will subsidise the service a bit, but I can't see any other benefits, least of all to users - and as James says, in many cases, people will now have to pay to get nothing, or almost nothing.

Best wishes,
Carrie

  • mumtoboys
  • mumtoboys's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
13 Jan 11 #244934 by mumtoboys
Reply from mumtoboys
Carrie,
It is possible to have the CSA do the calculation for you and then pursue the matter privately. I can't see any benefits to this personally (particularly as you say, the calculator is on their website), but perhaps it helps some parents feel confident they are paying/receiving the 'right' amount and is useful in that regard.

The other worry is the NRP using the threat of going to the CSA to bash the PWC over the head with - accept my £100 a month or you'll have to pay the admin fee at the CSA and end up with less....but of course, they pay late every month, on different dates, some months not at all etc. etc.

  • mumtoboys
  • mumtoboys's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
17 Jan 11 #245835 by mumtoboys
Reply from mumtoboys
the full proposal can be found here:

www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/strengthening-families.pdf

Deadline for comments is 7th April and should be sent to:

Child Maintenance Sponsorship and Strategic Policy Division
Department for Work and Pensions
1st Floor Caxton House
Tothill Street
London
SW1H 9NA
Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Telephone: 020 7449 5723

bedtime reading anyone?!

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11

Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.

 

We can help you to get a fair financial settlement.

Negotiate a fair deal from £299

Helping you negotiate a fair financial settlement with your spouse (or their solicitor) without going to court.


Financial Mediation from £399

Financial mediation is a convenient and inexpensive way to agree on a fair financial settlement.


Consent Orders from £950

This legally binding agreement defines how assets (e.g. properties and pensions) are to be divided.


Court Support from £299

Support for people who have to go to court to get a fair divorce financial settlement without a solicitor.