The UK's largest and most visited divorce site.
Modern, convenient and affordable services.

We've helped over 1 million people since 2007.

 
Click this button for details of our
email, phone nbr and free consultations.
 

How farcical is this

  • James53
  • James53's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
17 Jun 11 #273436 by James53
Topic started by James53
The ex has just been told that she doesn't have to pay anything for her kids as her net weekly income is less than £5.
How does she feed, clothe herself, pay rent, pay for mobile phone, car, insurance, tax, repairs, petrol etc etc etc on less than £5 per week.
At Easter I had to pay her £660 to look after the kids, even I can work out that is £12.69 per week.
Don't the CSA have bloody calculaters.

  • hadenoughnow
  • hadenoughnow's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
17 Jun 11 #273443 by hadenoughnow
Reply from hadenoughnow
James

Is her income all from benefits? If it is then she shd be paying £5 a week. Or perhaps she has shown a low income below the threshold when CSA payments would kick in? If you think she is not being honest and has a lifestyle incompatible with declared income, you can ask them to look at it again.

Hadenoughnow

  • James53
  • James53's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
17 Jun 11 #273450 by James53
Reply from James53
Well I am trying to do a life style incompatible with income appeal. But I mean really, how could any sane reasonable person believe that an NRP is earning less than £5 per week. She doesn't claim benefits.
I will have to stop all contact because on that basis she can't afford the petrol to come and see the kids.

  • pixy
  • pixy's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
17 Jun 11 #273451 by pixy
Reply from pixy
It does say 'net' income. Presumably there is some sort of allowance for essential expenditure.

  • James53
  • James53's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
17 Jun 11 #273469 by James53
Reply from James53
But when does net income come into it. I thought living expenses don't come into it. Any NPR dads can confirm this. It is 20% of net salary, ie after tax regardless.

  • WYSPECIAL
  • WYSPECIAL's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
17 Jun 11 #273484 by WYSPECIAL
Reply from WYSPECIAL
Living expenses do come into it if you are on CS1, how old is your claim?

On CS2 it is a Standard Rate IF the NRP is on net of £200 per week or more with a max of £2000 per week. For two kids this is 20% of net.

There are also the lesser used and often forgotten Reduced Rate for people on £100-£200 per week, Flat Rate for people on £5-£100 per week and Nil Rate for people on less than £5 per week.

Unless someone is supporting her how can she be living on less than £5 per week?

  • James53
  • James53's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
17 Jun 11 #273488 by James53
Reply from James53

Unless someone is supporting her how can she be living on less than £5 per week?


Precisely my point. Why aren't the CSA asking how she can survive on 71 pence per day.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11

Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.

 

We can help you to get a fair financial settlement.

Negotiate a fair deal from £299

Helping you negotiate a fair financial settlement with your spouse (or their solicitor) without going to court.


Financial Mediation from £399

Financial mediation is a convenient and inexpensive way to agree on a fair financial settlement.


Consent Orders from £950

This legally binding agreement defines how assets (e.g. properties and pensions) are to be divided.


Court Support from £299

Support for people who have to go to court to get a fair divorce financial settlement without a solicitor.