The UK's largest and most visited divorce site.
Modern, convenient and affordable services.

We've helped over 1 million people since 2007.

 
Click this button for details of our
email, phone nbr and free consultations.
 

Child maintenance in MOA

  • MrsMac2b
  • MrsMac2b's Avatar Posted by
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
26 Nov 12 #368108 by MrsMac2b
Topic started by MrsMac2b
After a long slog we have finally received a first draft moa in relation to my party''s divorce. There are a few minor tweaks/negotiations required however the big concern is the section re child maintenance.

My partner has three children with his ex. He has a specialist job that tends to only allow for short term contracts and these are not always easy to find. This means that when he is working he generally earns well however there can be substantial periods between contracts, in other words he earns nothing.

Child support has always been between the two and he pays dependant on his earnings from whatever contract he is on. We always calculate this using the CSA online calculator, taking into consideration the usual things like overnights with us etc. I accept it''s not ideal as it can vary from very large monthly payments to next to nothing, believe me we hate this too and struggle month to month (I should mention my partner is bankrupt so there are no assets or savings etc).

Having now received the minute of agreement it has been written into it by her lawyer that he will pay £199 per child per month (£597) and that this amount will increase by 4% every year until the children are 18. The youngest two, twins, are currently 8. Effectively this means that by the time the twins are 18 he will be paying circa £800 a month.

The issue we have is this. That amount (£597) is what he has paid the last five months, the reason being he had a 6 month contract, which was a huge bonus as usually he finds work for two/three weeks at a time (offshore). That contract ends on December 10th after which my partner will need to sign on and hope something comes up.

After this month my partners income is zero and the nature of his work means it will always be up and down (something his ex knows). In the circumstances use simply can''t commit to a set amount each month. H simply does not make enough money and has long period of unemployment. Add to this the we hope to start a family of our own therefore these amounts are impossible for us to pay.

My question is this, is this wording standard and can we have something more flexible in a moa to reflect the changing income my partner has? Bottom line he can''t pay what he doesn''t even earn and there seems little point agreeing a set amount only to fall into arrearsand have to apply to have the order varied.

  • Fiona
  • Fiona's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
27 Nov 12 #368117 by Fiona
Reply from Fiona
He shouldn''t sign the agreement if he can''t keep to it. If he signs he is locked into it for 12 months and he would need to apply to court to vary the amount he paid. It''s difficult to word a Separation Agreement so that payments are flexible. The alternatives would be to agree a family based arrangement or make payments through the CSA. Have a look at the CM Options website.

  • MrsMac2b
  • MrsMac2b's Avatar Posted by
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
27 Nov 12 #368124 by MrsMac2b
Reply from MrsMac2b
Hi Fiona, thank you. That is the crux of what we want the moa to reflect. Namely that payments will be be by arrangement as per CSA guidelines. Essentially what they do already and have done for the last five years. The £599 in the moa is only what he has paid for the last 5 months on te basis of his current contract, after which the amount wil change again depending on his next pay scale, often she gets more than £599 a month but is totally dependant on what work he finds and when. Do you know if it is possible to have wording to that effect? We are seeing lawyer on Friday but I''m worrying sick that this will hold things up so jumping the gun and asking the question here.

  • Fiona
  • Fiona's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
27 Nov 12 #368180 by Fiona
Reply from Fiona
The wording is fraught with difficulties. For example, CSA rules include verification of income and if a separation agreement states CM as per CSA guidelines it leaves open who is to verify the income, when and how. That is why it is usual to agree a flat rate with perhaps an annual increase. It would be better to say that CM will be paid voluntarily or through the CSA.

  • MrsMac2b
  • MrsMac2b's Avatar Posted by
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
27 Nov 12 #368187 by MrsMac2b
Reply from MrsMac2b
Thanks Fiona. Having spoken with the ex it seems she is agreeable to this and is happy for the current arrangement to continue. She insists she asked her lawyer not to send that wording as it does not reflect how they work. She understands how his work is, having been that way when thy were married also. Finger crossed and thanks for your advice.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11

Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.

 

We can help you to get a fair financial settlement.

Negotiate a fair deal from £299

Helping you negotiate a fair financial settlement with your spouse (or their solicitor) without going to court.


Financial Mediation from £399

Financial mediation is a convenient and inexpensive way to agree on a fair financial settlement.


Consent Orders from £950

This legally binding agreement defines how assets (e.g. properties and pensions) are to be divided.


Court Support from £299

Support for people who have to go to court to get a fair divorce financial settlement without a solicitor.