This one was used about a year ago,
IN THE xxxxxxx COUNTY COURT CASE NO : Cxxxxxxxxx
BETWEEN:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Applicant
And
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Respondent
Position Statement
Background
1. This is a short marriage of less than 3 years. The parties married on the xxxxxxxx and separated in xxxxxxxxx
2. The Applicant left the
marital home in May xxxx after aggressively attacking the eldest son of the Respondent, and informed the Respondent in July xxxx of her decision to separate and have a divorce.
3. The Respondent was born on the xxxxxxxx and the Applicant, xxxxxxx. There is a child of the marriage who currently resides with the Applicant, born xxxxxxx to which the Applicant has cessed the respondents access since December xxxx.
4. The Respondent resides in the former
matrimonial home with his son from a previous relationship; he is thirteen years of age. The Applicant resides in council rented accommodation with the parties son to which the Applicant has cessed the respondents access since December 2008.
5. The Applicant issued Divorce proceedings based on Adulty and the
Decree Nisi was pronounced on xxxxxxxx(8 months ago), The
Decree Absolute has yet to ne pronounced.
(a) Income and earning capacity
The respondent has been paying a monthly
child maintenance to the Applicant , However since December xxxx the Applicant has ceased the respondents access to the parties son.
The Applicant has higher qualifications than the Respondent and has ability to have a greater earning capacity than the Respondent.
(b) Financial needs, obligations and responsibilities
The former matrimonial home was purchased by the respondent in December xxxx for himself and his two children from a previous relationship and its in his sole name.
The Applicant resides safely and securely in council rented accommodation (x bedroom semi detached property)
(c) Standard of living
The parties lived beyond their means due to the demands of the Applicant to which substantial debt was incurred and the Respondent is still re-paying.
(d) Age of the parties
Applicant – 31
Respondent – 44
Marriage lasted less than 3 years
(e) Physical and Mental disability
n/a
(f) Contributions
The respondent paid £xxxxx of his own savings as the deposit for the property that became the matrimonial home.
The Applicant has not made any payments towards the mortgage and utilities within the matrimonial home.
The Respondent paid all costs for the Applicant to travel to the UK including all Visa expenses even though the Applicant portrayed to be a successful wealthy businesswoman.
The Applicant was encourage by the Respondent to work and the allegations pertaining from the applicant with respect to not being allowed to work and it was expected to serve hand and foot to the respondent and his children are a complete and total fabrication. The Respondent would say this is typical illusion, one of many that the applicant had.
(g) Conduct
The Respondent would say that the Applicant had constantly attempted to control all.
(h) Pension
The Respondent is unaware if the Applicant has any Pension or other savings back in the Applicants homeland of the xxxxx.
The Respondent has two pensions both of which have accumulated significantly prior to the marriage. Opt-out of Serps pension since the Respondent was 18 years old and a company pension that’s been running for over xx years.
Due to the very short marriage of less than 3 years the Respondent feels that the rights to any value held should be minimal.
(i) Wellbeing of the parties child
The Applicant has been using the parties son as a tool to attack the respondent , during the 3rd quarter of xxxx the Applicant started to refuse the Respondents access to the parties son on an ad-hoc basis.
The Applicant has since ceased the Respondents access to the parties son since December xxxx until now.
Position Statement
The Respondent seeks:
The Respondent seeks a resolution that will reinstate the Respondents access to his child.
The Respondent seeks a
Clean Break.
The respondent seeks to keep intact the Respondents Pension.
Due to the current economic environment the Respondent would like any lumpsum to be delayed until the Respondents son of 13 years of age reached maturity as refinancing at this point of time will prove difficult especially as the Respondent is still paying the credit card debt.