The UK's largest and most visited divorce site.
Modern, convenient and affordable services.

We've helped over 1 million people since 2007.

 
Click this button for details of our
email, phone nbr and free consultations.
 

Seperation

  • Nao
  • Nao's Avatar Posted by
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
07 Apr 09 #105571 by Nao
Topic started by Nao
I'm going through a seperation (we are not married) and would appreciate any help or advice. Last year my partner stated that she wanted to seperate and since then we have continued to live together.
Recently she said that she wanted me to move out, and had contacted her brother in law who is a financial advisor, who said he would assist her with remortgaging the property.
We had an evaluation and I have agreed with the figure and said I would take my half. This meant she would end up with a bigger mortgage and said she has already been turned down by one mortgage lender as her salary is not enough. We both agree that we want to keep the house as it would be too disruptive to the children if we move.
She has now suggested that I move out but keep my name on the mortgage, stating that she would sell the house when our daughters are 18 (about 11 years time), and then we split the money. As I said I want what's best for our children so I'm considering this route but are there any issues regading this set up. Do I need to get an agreement drawn up, would it affect the amount of money I'm owed as she would have ended up paying more money towards it.
If you've got this far thanks for taking the time to read this and any advice would be greatly appreciated!

  • Elle
  • Elle's Avatar
  • User is blocked
  • User is blocked
More
07 Apr 09 #105574 by Elle
Reply from Elle
Nao,

It would be adviseable to have any agreement you reach formalised...people change their mind over time...best of luck, hope things remain amicable for you all.

Elle x

  • Nao
  • Nao's Avatar Posted by
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
07 Apr 09 #105577 by Nao
Reply from Nao
Thanks..would I go to a soliciter, and if so do they charge a lot for this?

  • Elle
  • Elle's Avatar
  • User is blocked
  • User is blocked
More
07 Apr 09 #105579 by Elle
Reply from Elle
Nao,

If possible, I personally would bypass the sols and have the courts stamp of approval...peeps here can help you draft/tidy an agreement.

Elle x

  • Active8
  • Active8's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
07 Apr 09 #105592 by Active8
Reply from Active8
Not sure what you are suggesting the court will approve, Elle, if Nao isn't married? There is no order the court can make between them.

You do need advice: have you considered for example that there will possibly be Capital Gains Tax to pay by the time you get your share? This sort of arrangement needs to be formalised, or you may discover you can't recover what you expected.

If you keep your name on the mortgage you will be keeping your name on the property. That may affect your future mortgage capacity.

Who is paying the mortgage? If she is, does what she pay come out of the value of the house at the time of division? Or is it treated as a fair price for her keeping the house in the meantime?

Who pays if there is a big uninsured loss/damage?

what is the mechanism for ensuring you actually can get your money when you expect it?

What if she cohabits or indeed marries?

These, and several other things, are all points I routinely see as a solicitor, often when people didn't sort them out in the first place and then end up in dispute later.

A house is a big investment, only do this on the cheap if you are prepared to risk losing on your investment. It shouldn't be a complicated agreement, but it does need someone who understands property law (not necessarily a family law lawyer).

  • Elle
  • Elle's Avatar
  • User is blocked
  • User is blocked
More
07 Apr 09 #105601 by Elle
Reply from Elle
Thanks Active, I am confusing the SFLA 2006 re Cohabitees...soz Nao.

Active...how would an agreement such as this be formalised?

Elle x

  • Active8
  • Active8's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
07 Apr 09 #105634 by Active8
Reply from Active8
A written Separation Agreement works fine.

Because there is no statutory jurisdiction dealing with co-habitees, as such, they are free to contract with each other as they see fit, in a way that spouses haven't been able to do in a binding way to the same extent (altho recent case law suggests that is now potentially changing: McLeod v McLeod.

A deed saying what everyone's respective entitlements and obligations are in respect of the house will do it.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11

Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.

 

We can help you to get a fair financial settlement.

Negotiate a fair deal from £299

Helping you negotiate a fair financial settlement with your spouse (or their solicitor) without going to court.


Financial Mediation from £399

Financial mediation is a convenient and inexpensive way to agree on a fair financial settlement.


Consent Orders from £950

This legally binding agreement defines how assets (e.g. properties and pensions) are to be divided.


Court Support from £299

Support for people who have to go to court to get a fair divorce financial settlement without a solicitor.