Laundry
What Fleur is saying makes a lot of sense and I hope you won't run away with the idea that I am unsympathetic because my reply is factual and emotionally flat. Believe me, what I went through would make your hair curl, but it is in the past and time heals.
I think your position regarding the house is a strong one, partly because of your contributions, partly because you have dependent children.
There are four ways in which Courts can deal with the family home.
1. It may be transferred outright to one party ; this is not a common order, but it might be done, for example, if the couple own two houses, the husband gets one and the wife the other . Where such an order is made it would be normal for spousal maintenance to be reduced or even cancelled as compensation to the dispossessed spouse.
2. It may be sold and the proceeds divided ; this would be normal if the parties are relatively young, the marriage short and there are no children.
3. One party may buy the other out.
4. Where there are children, their welfare and need for a home is regarded as the most important consideration. It can happen that the Court orders a sale and division of the proceeds, but the sale may be postponed until the children are no longer dependent, and, in exceptional cases, even longer. Those on the site who are solicitors practising family law tell me that this type of order is becoming less common.
Which of these solutions is most appropriate depends entirely on the parties' individual circumstances.
The case law on the issue of cohabitation before marriage seems to suggest that it is the length of the marriage that is most important but contributions before marriage can be taken into account, as was the case in Gojkovic, 1990 1 FLR 140 where a wife received a substantial award based on contributions during cohabitation. Contrast this with Krystman. 1973 1973 3 All ER 247 where the couple were married for 26 years and only lived together for a fortnight ( ! ) and no financial provision was ordered. Mind you I doubt how much value cases of that antiquity are these days.
I think I would caution you against just paying over £10K, unless you do it in such a way as will make it clear that this sum is paid in full settlement, because, if you don't, there is always the possibility of his coming back for more. Ask your solicitor about a
Consent Order and (s)he will explain why you need one.
But this is not an exam question, and Fleur's point about costs is well made. I can't comment in detail about likely outcomes without the full facts ( so make sure your solicitor has at least the basic information, because he won't get far without it ) but the more you spend on lawyers, the less there is for the two of you, and your children. It would be sensible to ask your solicitor for a general idea of the costs that could be involved in a contested application for ancillary relief.
You are free to show this reply to your solicitor if you wish. Good luck.
Mike 100468